Word, but i think you should give it more credit.
word, it is better than most shit these days, so i would usually be wuick to give it extra credit, but i am starting to be honest. a LOT of albums that have been rated as like 3-5 recently have been far below that. i think a 3.5 means u have dropped a very solid album, whereas most magazines might think a 3.5 is an okay one. cats gettin 4s and higher tho for shit that just isn't exceptional, different, or mind-blowing is gettin tiresome on the real. i don;t care if GZA gets a 2.5 in a rating by me, he'll always be dope, but i gotta rate an album based off what it is as an album, not off how it compares to other albums that may have been rated higher by reatrded-ass magazine columnists/label dick suckers. u knowledge me god?